Pay reviews – Median back up to 2.5% on foot of higher private sector awards

Our latest analysis shows the median pay award across the economy back at 2.5% for the three months to the end of October 2018, having dipped to 2.4% in September. The interquartile range has widened marginally from between 2% and 2.8% to between 2% and 2.9% and the average has also ticked up, under the influence of more higher-end awards in the private sector, with a quarter of pay awards worth 3% or more in the latest period.

Continue reading Pay reviews – Median back up to 2.5% on foot of higher private sector awards

Pay reviews – One third of pay awards at or above 3.0%

While the median pay increase across the economy remains steady at 2.5%, the proportion of awards at or above 3% has increased in the three months to the end of September 2018, according to the latest monitored figures from IDR. The private sector median also remains at 2.5%. The proportion of higher awards, ie those at or above 3.0%, account for a third of all the awards in the sample, up from a quarter in the previous period.

Continue reading Pay reviews – One third of pay awards at or above 3.0%

Increase to statutory minimum rates

The Government has raised the minimum wage based on the Low Pay Commission’s recommendations. The new statutory minimum for workers aged 25 and over, or the National Living Wage (NLW), will increase by 4.9% to £8.21 in April 2019.

The LPC have said that the NLW is on track to rise to £8.62 in April 2020 based on the target of 60% of median earnings.

Bryan Sanderson, Chair of the LPC, said:

I am pleased that the Government has again accepted in full the Low Pay Commission’s recommendations for future minimum wage rates. The increase in the National Living Wage (NLW) to £8.21 in April 2019 will ensure a pay rise for the lowest-paid workers that exceeds both inflation and average earnings.

Pay reviews – August median remains at 2.5%

The median pay award across the whole economy remains at 2.5% in the three months to the end of August 2018, according to the latest figures from IDR. The median remained steady in both the private and public sectors, at 2.5% and 2.0% respectively. Awards at firms in the manufacturing area produced an increased median of 2.8%, up by 0.4% since the three months to July with a similar sample size.

Continue reading Pay reviews – August median remains at 2.5%

IDR supports local girls’ football team

Incomes Data Research (IDR) has become an official sponsor of Billericay Girls under 14 football team.

Commenting on the announcement, IDR Director Louisa Withers said:

“IDR is committed to making a tangible difference to society in the way we run our business and recognises that we have a responsibility to our clients, employees and contractors and the wider community in which we operate. When asked about sponsoring this exciting young team we felt it provided a perfect way of putting our principals into practice.”

“We feel it is important to encourage young people to take part in sport. Aside from the health benefits, sports help young people develop skills for later in life, such as confidence and the ability to work as part of a team.”

Our support secures funding for the team’s biggest priority – new kits for the 2018/2019 season. We wish all the players an enjoyable and hopefully successful season ahead.


Viewpoint – Heightened staffing pressures could make for increased pay awards in 2019

We publish the results of our pay planning survey – which looks at employers’ reward intentions for 2019 – at a time when the economy and the labour market present a series of apparent paradoxes. On the one hand, economic growth is weak in comparison with previous periods, with the manufacturing sector virtually in recession and job losses in parts of retail. Productivity growth has faltered since the crash of 2009, and business investment remains low in historic terms.

On the other hand, the labour market seems to be robust, at least in terms of falling unemployment (down to 4%, a figure it last reached in the mid-1970s) and still growing employment. But there is a debate about the extent to which the labour market may have a soft underbelly. This is mostly framed in terms of how ‘underemployment’ – the extent to which employees would like to work more hours, while falling, is still some way above pre-recession levels, indicating that there are still areas of weakness in the labour market. Our survey results tend to support the view that the labour market is tighter, or at least tightening. Over three-fifths of respondents said that pay pressures are increasing, with recruitment and retention issues the main factor behind this. It could be that we have reached the point where it is no longer possible to reduce unemployment and raise employment without increasing wages further. The changing make-up of the labour market in the run-up to and in the aftermath of Brexit could also be a factor here. In addition, while inflation is not as high as it has been in previous periods, it remains at moderate levels and is expected to remain so over the next period, with the possibility that Brexit could see it rise further (see forecasts on page 5). It is not surprising, therefore, that the cost of living has become more important for employers when it comes to determining the level of pay rises. These pressures could produce higher pay rises in 2019 than in 2018. We asked respondents how they thought their 2019 pay awards would compare to inflation. Similar proportions – just below a third – thought they would be equal to the RPI and CPI/CPIH in each case, while just above a quarter thought that pay rises would be in-between the CPI/CPIH and RPI percentage rates. If economists’ predictions are correct and the RPI is around 3% in the first quarter of 2019, then we could see a third of awards at this level (with a further small proportion, 6%, above the RPI). A further third could be worth around 2.2%, while just above a quarter could be set at intermediate levels, eg around 2.6%. Overall this points to between three-fifths and two-thirds of pay awards in 2019 coming in at 2.6% or higher, with many of these at 3% or above. Meanwhile the NLW will also continue to present an upward pressure at the lower end of the earnings distribution.

Other issues for HR/reward professionals in the year ahead include the burgeoning agenda around the reporting of various pay statistics. Employers had to publish their gender pay gaps for the first time this year. The new rules made for an enhanced focus on equal pay issues, even if figures for gaps by job or grade were not required, and this is unlikely to diminish. In fact, the prospect of extra data requirements figured in the Conservatives’ 2016 manifesto and is therefore possible even if the current administration survives. Indeed, the Commons committee on the lessons learnt from the introduction of gender pay gap reporting makes a number of recommendations that point in this direction, including gaps at deciles rather than quartiles and measures to improve data accuracy.

Added to this (in 2020) will be the obligation to report the ratios between the salaries of chief executives’ and those for each firm’s ‘average’ worker. All of this means that properly communicating reward practices to employees will gain in importance over the coming period. Another emerging theme is the possibility that more employers could consider linking pay to productivity improvements. This can be done crudely in those instances where output can be easily measured, but in most cases the emphasis is likely to be on connections between salaries and some indicator of capability, competency or skills. These sorts of relationships could help improve the economy’s poor performance in respect of productivity.
It has to be said, though, that widespread developments in this area are unlikely without a rise in business investment. This tends to be positively related to wage growth. Indeed, the fact that business investment has faltered in the wake of the recession and in the advent of Britain’s departure from the EU is a key explanation for the relatively weak real-terms wage growth witnessed since the crash. For the economy to resume growth, investment will have to begin again, whatever the UK’s relationship with its nearest trading partners. If and when it does, wage growth is likely to be stronger.